4 Great Tips Dealing With Your Child Custody Case
Copyright (c) 2009 Ron Lasorsa
Child Custody
Custody is a highly litigated area of family law that can be both expensive and emotionally draining, even when done correctly. The following represents some pointers designed to help parties avoid the stress, expense and emotional damage often attributed to child custody litigation;
1. Try to come to agreements on your own: Parties who craft their own custody agreements are usually much happier with the outcome because they feel like they have played an active role in the decision and are consequently more apt to comply. In addition, you do not need an attorney to come to your own stipulation which can save hundreds, even thousands of dollars. It is far better for the two people who know a child best to come to a decision related to custody than leaving it in the hands of a stranger.
2. Seek out an experienced mediator: Custody mediators can play a crucial role in the outcome of a custody battle. These individuals can be retired attorneys, current attorneys or mediators with divorce experience, for example. The goal of mediation is to come to an agreement with which both parties can live by a give-and-take principle. Parties in mediation realize that they must give a little to get a little and the spirit of compromise is what makes mediation actually work. In the event that you are unable to come to agreements on your own, mediators can be very useful.
3. Work with existing court orders, even the recommendations: If you are in litigation and you have existing court orders, learn to work within the framework of what you have. For example, if the court order has recommended parenting classes, you should take them. Now, if the court orders you to do a proscribed activity, such as drug test or drop children off at a specific time and day, you do not have the option of whether or not to comply.
4. Seek out individual counseling: If some of your anxiety or stress stems from the fact that you are actually still grieving the loss of the relationship, it is wise to seek out private counseling to work through some of these issues to avoid the inevitable impact on your children.
The impact of divorce on children is extraordinary. Anyone who thinks that their children are not affected is not paying any attention to the obvious signs. The above are mere suggestions to avoid some or all of the emotional detriment to your child(ren) that divorce can cause such as:
- Regressive behavior: Children who experience any trauma, particularly divorce may exhibit certain regressive behaviors such as fit throwing, tantrums, refusing to sleep alone and bed wetting, for example.
- Defiance and rebelliousness: This form of disobedience might manifest itself at home or at school. It may stem from a child's desire to gain their parents attention in hopes of taking the focus off the divorce. Depending on the age and maturity of the child, they may feel as though they can actually do something to stop this divorce from happening even if it is in the form of very negative behavior.
- Social difficulty: Children who have a tumultuous home life can have difficulty interacting socially due to depression, sadness or grief at the loss of the family structure.
- Statistics: Studies show that children of divorced homes are more likely to drop out of high school (and are at a greater risk of teenage pregnancy. Children from divorced families have higher incidence of truancy and negative attitudes toward school.
Yes, there are an equal number of studies out there that support the proposition that children from divorced families are no different emotionally, academically or financially. But more than likely those funding said studies are the very individuals who profit from the big business of child custody - Family law attorneys. It has been proven time and time again that a two parent household is best and that children who have to endure the divorce of their parents suffer. Therefore, if divorce is the only option, the way to minimize and hopefully eliminate the impact on the children is to be mature, try to work things out between the two of you, seek out an experienced mediator when unable to do so, follow all court orders and get yourself the spiritual or psychological counseling YOU need to move on and be the best parent YOU can be.
Ron Lasorsa is the founder of the Kids Come First Coalition. For further help with your custody battles go to http://greatcustody411.com/
Article Source: ArticlesBase.com
|
full legal custody of child, wanting to move out of state?
if the father only has visitation where he sometimessss comes. and i want to move out of state to better my life for my son. (jamestown has nothing here, no jobs, poor education).
would i be able to?
i mean, the father doesnt want to further his education, doesnt work or anything.
i dont want my son to grow up somewhere where he isnt going to have anything to show for himself like i did growing up or like his father did. his father agrees on why i want to move but then he cant see his son "when he wants" which is like once a week if he shows up.
i go next Thursday to see a lawyer to see what all i can do, i just want to know what to expect.
never was married to the guy.
he left me when i was pregnant.
and i have full legal custody of my child
he only gets visitation, supervised at my house for two hours a week. if he shows.
oh and in the first court papers it says "mother is thinking about moving our of state for better life of her child" and we have to "revisit" that. we were supposed to on may 1st. so the court atleast knows and has it written down that i might be moving.
court papers are only a few months old. and if he actually tried to be a father it would be completely different. ive been wayyy too nice to him. and i never once called him a loser. what i said it true. its even in court papers.
even with that, i dont want my son growing up with a father who steals, gets arrested, is always on drugs. that the kind of life you want your child to have?
lol, just because i got knocked up means nothing. he wasnt on drugs and like that when i was with him. at all. so that shouldnt even matter first of all. that was all after, i mean, check his jail records if its really that big of a deal. some of you people blow at answering the question i actually want.
Get the answers
|
|
Government Should Quit the Marriage Business?
I found this article "Government Should Quit the Marriage Business," which I believe would be a good solution to the political debate on gay marriage. I'm not looking to influence or persuade anyone, I'm just looking for people to post what good points and flaws they see.
http://www.rossde.com/editorials/Dershowitz_marriage.html
"The decision of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court declaring that gays have a constitutional right to marry could become a powerful wedge issue in American politics. There is, however, a way to avoid that.
Those who oppose gay marriage believe deeply that marriage is sacreda divine, a blessed sacrament between man and woman as ordained in the Bible. If they are right, then the entire concept of marriage has no place in our civil society, which recognizes the separation between the sacred and the secular, between church and state.
The state is, of course, concerned with the secular rights and responsibilities that are currently associated with the sacrament of marriage: the financial consequences of divorce, the custody of children, Social Security and hospital benefits, etc.
The solution is to unlink the religious institution of marriage ? as distinguished from the secular institution of civil union ? from the state. Under this proposal, any couple could register for civil union, recognized by the state, with all its rights and responsibilities.
Religious couples could then go to the church, synagogue, mosque or other sacred institution of their choice in order to be married. These religious institutions would have total decision-making authority over which marriages to recognize. Catholic churches would not recognize gay marriages. Orthodox Jewish synagogues would not recognize a marriage between a Jew and a non-Jew who did not wish to convert to Judaism. And those religious institutions that chose to recognize gay marriages could do so. It would be entirely a religious decision beyond the scope of the state.
Under this new arrangement, marriage would remain a sacrament, as ordained by the Bible and as interpreted by each individual church. No secular consequences would flow from marriage, only from civil union.
In this way, gay couples would win exactly the same rights as heterosexual couples in relationship to the state. They would still have to persuade individual churches of their point of view, but that is not the concern of the secular state.
Not only would this solution be good for gays and for those who oppose gay marriage on religious grounds, it would also strengthen the wall of separation between church and state by placing a sacred institution entirely in the hands of the church while placing a secular institution under state control.
Although this proposal may sound radical, it does not differ fundamentally ? except for labels ? from the situation that exists in many states today. Throughout the United States, couples have the option of being married civilly by going to town halls or to a justice of the peace and simply signing a marriage certificate. They also have the option of going to a church, synagogue or mosque and being married in a religious ceremony. So most Americans already have the choice between a sacrament and a secular agreement ratified by the state.
All that would be different would be the name we give the secular agreement. The word "marriage" would be reserved for those who chose the religious sacrament.
Though some traditionalists would be certain to balk at an explicit division between marriage and civil union, a majority of Americans already agree that gay couples should be allowed to join in secular unions with the rights and responsibilities that generally accompany marriage.
So let each couple decide whether they want to receive the sacrament of marriage or the secular status of civil union. And let the state get out of the business of determining who should receive holy sacraments. "
Get the answers
|
|
Multiple quiz ans some one please help stuck in few!?
The Statute of Frauds applies only to: (Points : 1)
illegal contracts
executory contracts
executed contracts
voidable contracts
. A call for a bid or estimate for materials to be furnished or work to be done is considered a(n): (Points : 1)
general offer
request for an offer
request for a purchase order
public offer
. Prenuptial agreements relating to custody of children in the event of divorce or separation are enforceable. (Points : 1)
True
False
All of the following, except one, limit how a firm may operate and therefore act as legal restraints of trade: (Points : 1)
licensing regulations
zoning regulations
safety regulations
environmental regulations
. Consideration in an agreement means: (Points : 1)
the legal terms used in the contract
the parties' exchange of promises
the competence of the parties
the intent of the contract
The party to whom a promise is made in the making of a contract is known as: (Points : 1)
guarantor
promisee
underwriter
promisor
18. Consideration required in an enforceable contract can take any of the following forms except: (Points : 1)
gratuitous promises
exchange of promises
forbearance
pledges or subscriptions
Get the answers
|
